Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.
Interested in politics, sci-fi, gardening, and shitposting
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Judge Rebecca Taibleson, finds her name in the Epstein files. Guess who she clerked for? Umhmm. Scalia.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[This post could not be retrieved]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.If you want to FINALLY watch Scott Bessent get pinned down on specifics about the illegal money laundering operation being conducted by the Trump admin from someone who knows WTF he’s talking about, this clip is your chance. Bessent gets destroyed.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.under different circumstances this is congressional-inquiry level scandal
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Between Jeff Bezos' evisceration of The Washington Post, Bill Gates' appearance in the Epstein Files, and, you know, every single thing Elon Musk has done, at least we'll see the end of the Myth of the Benevolent Billionaires.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Miller clumsily deployed an army of masked goons to commit crimes across the nation and, in the process, destroyed Trump's best-polling issue and sent his approval plummeting to an all-time low. But sure, this was a "rare misstep" and not part of a larger pattern of incompetence
- Stephen Miller called Alex Pretti a “domestic terrorist” after the VA nurse was killed by federal agents, a rare misstep for Miller, the White House aide stoking President Trump’s boundary-pushing impulses. 🔗: on.wsj.com/49XmNXz
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one."Trump likely to lose latest fight over felony convictions" After roughly three hours of oral arguments, Judge Hellerstein seems no more likely to transfer Trump's criminal case to federal court than he was the last two times he rejected similar efforts. My recap at All Rise News buff.ly/JpC0Bge
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.A publisher who lays off a reporter whose pen is freezing because she's covering a frigid war zone while dodging missiles is not an editor you want to work for, in a more perfect world
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.realistically they are doing this because they need them elsewhere and this is not sustainable and that in itself is a victory for the MN resistance
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Burn billionaires to the ground. www.npr.org/2026/02/04/n...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Bezos isn't destroying the Washington Post because it isn't profitable. He's destroying the Washington Post because he's calculated that a robust free press threatens the ability of his class to warp society around their interests
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Incredible. They destroyed a great newspaper because they hated the people who actually paid for it and read it so much that they'd rather scrap the paper if they couldn't get Tucker Carlson's audience bsky.app/profile/maxt...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.The guy who owns Amazon shutting down the books section of the Washington Post is beyond parody
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one."ICE guys are pretty miserable. I don’t think morale is particularly high for them. They’re freezing, they’re getting shouted at. They can’t go anywhere without being tailed by 5 cars. They get out and immediately there's a crowd of 100 people shouting at them, blowing whistles as loud as they can."
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.so crazy to me that a woman asked trump if he has any words for epstein's victims and he said "you as a young woman should smile more." it will go nowhere bc republicans refuse to hold trump accountable, but it's still pretty crazy.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Scenes from a personalist regime: the president speaks directly with the security agents expected to generate a justification for his taking control over elections
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.I personally do not think some rich man should be able to buy an institution like this like a toy and then break it when he doesn’t want to play with it anymore. bsky.app/profile/benm...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.I’m sharing Aliya’s entire opening statement. We owe it to her, and those who no longer have a voice, to watch. youtu.be/zrcW8SZtYpI?...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Pamela Jo Bondi is protecting pedophiles. She is disgusting and needs to be investigated.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.i would be overjoyed if the U.S. had a president as ethical and even-tempered as Chancellor Gowron
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.not saying he's necessarily in the organization, but this skull face mask was popular among members of the Proud Boys a few years ago
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Fucking surreal that people dressed like this and carrying assault rifles are permitted to kidnap people off our streets
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.What's the crime here?
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Martinez: "[I] sat in federal court and watched from 20 feet away as the border patrol agent who attempted to kill me testified at a hearing. Agent Charles Exum—Charles Exum, my attempted executioner was Charles Exum—I hope the government does not consider my use of his name here to be...doxxing."
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Apparently morale at DOJ is so low that line attorneys are asking to be held in contempt so they can get some sleep yikes
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.This is unreal. An AUSA talking like that in open court is about as close as you can come to a total breakdown. Never heard of anything like it.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.I wonder how many in Congress grasp just how serious this is.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.I think this is the essential quality that made CBP/BP and ICE so easily convertible into fascist squadristi www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.it's grim, but the reality is that Trump wants more innocent people to die here in the Twin Cities and the GOP majorities in both chambers of Congress are either ambivalent about more lives being taken or outright support it
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.An important point: The American people are not ambivalent. They may think they want a shooting war in MSP but they are not prepared for the level of backlash if they murder another observer.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.If many people hold a left-wing opinion they are a mob and should be ignored; if few people hold a left wing opinion they are fringe and should be ignored. The substance or correctness of the opinion is irrelevant. This is the reactionary centrist credo bsky.app/profile/eliv...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.happening this morning in Minneapolis -- ICE agents drawing guns on observers. I reiterate again that it is only a matter of time before DHS kills more innocent people in Minnesota. Congress needs to shut this shit down right now.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Three rules in FBI firearm training: 1. Always point your weapon downrange 2. Do not point your weapon at anything you do not intend to shoot 3. Don’t put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to shoot Guns are not for threatening compliance for unarmed people doing things you don’t like
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.New in PN: Guns for me, but not for thee "The larger lesson of Pretti’s murder is that when it comes to guns and gun rights, most defenders of Trump’s proto-fascist police state clearly believe the Second Amendment exists to protect conservatives but bind liberals."
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.This is absolutely insane: DHS claims the right to subpoena your emails and to send investigators to your house. In this case, because a retiree sent the mildest possible criticism to a prosecutor. No judges involved. www.washingtonpost.com/investigatio...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Jodi Kantor in the NY Times reports that the Chief Justice requested Court employees sign nondisclosure agreements in November 2024 - moving to formal contracts requiring silence/confidentiality after Trump was reelected: www.nytimes.com/2026/02/02/u...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.DOJ is apparently taking all this time & violating the Transparency Act deadline in order to protect criminals, not the victims.
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.exactly. this is not difficult. as.ft.com/r/58ed1b23-d...
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Eric. No, not that one. Or that one.Judge Reyes’s conclusion: “There is an old adage among lawyers. If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither, pound the table. … Having neither and bringing the adage into the 21st century, [Noem] pounds X (f/k/a Twitter).”
