Matt Berkley
Sentientism, food policy for desired/anticipated consumption patterns, plant-based food for climate, consumption behaviour, history and reporting of global goals, framing.
- Perhaps the Committee on Publication Ethics might include in its guidelines: When an article is retracted, publishers should notify authors of all papers which have cited it.
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Could a US legal expert provide information/views on this, or give context - What are the duties of members of the US armed forces if ordered to: a) consider, b) plan, c) prepare for, d) facilitate, or e) give purported justification for action which would be unlawful if carried out?
- RR: Rigorous Review. RPR: Rigorous Part-Review. Competent, useful critical appraisal does not necessarily need a "peer" as regards ability to assess more than one aspect of a research article - or to cover more than one aspect. PRR: Positive Rigorous Review. PR2: Positive Rigorous Part-Review.
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- "If there are two steps in my argument and each has 70% probability then I am probably wrong. 70/100 x 70/100 = 4900/10000 = 49%." web.archive.org/web/20081121...
- Shall we say "published article" (or "draft" if the authors prefer) instead of "preprint" if it's published on the internet, and "traditionally published" or "published with a claim of initial peer review" if it's traditionally "published"?
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Shall we call traditional peer review (for example, secret, only involving a couple of reviewers who may not between them have all the required skills, knowledge and experience, and unpaid) initial peer review: IPR?
- Is the bigger threat "AI" or "IA", InAttention?
- When is the Caracas Oil Party?
- "all Fellows and Foreign Members are expected to follow the Nolan principles of public life, namely: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...
- More than one ethical problem here: "For the purposes of these Regulations, “Misconduct” means all and any behaviour...which Council shall in its reasonable discretion consider to be seriously injurious to the reputation or interests of the Society." royalsociety.org/-/media/abou...
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Moonahead Jupiter now shows ~where we've reached, in Gemini, as we orbit the Sun (Earth/Jupiter orbits are slightly inclined). Also, today's half moon (15.48 GMT) will be in the ~direction of our orbit round the Sun (within ~10 moon "widths": Moon's orbit is inclined to the orbit round the Sun).
- Moonpass The Moon always overtakes Earth on the outside. This is usually a Full Moon; sometimes a Shademoon/Part Shademoon (lunar eclipse). Passmoon Earth always overtakes the Moon on the outside. A New Moon; sometimes a total/partial Moonsun/Sunmoon/Sunblock (solar eclipse).
- Some astronomy words Showsun/Sunshow/Revealsun/Sunreveal/Seesun/Sunsee/Uncoversun/Sununcover/HRS (Horizon Reveals Sun) Hidesun/Suncover/Coversun/HHS (Horizon Hides Sun) Showmoon/Hidemoon/Mooncover etc.
- Happy Nirjup today, and happy Passjup tomorrow! We overtake Jupiter about every 13 months. The "nearest" time and the "overtaking" time are different because of the orbital paths. Tomorrow Jupiter will be sopposite (sort-of-opposite) the Sun: the orbits are inclined.
- From 2003: "the mortality flaw and the inflation flaw....may have contributed to the devising of policies which, though they made the statistics look better, made the condition of poor people worse." econpapers.repec.org/paper/prampr...
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- These posts look interesting to me, but claims about how many times something was "read" or "watched" seem to go beyond evidence and reason, if they're based on clicks. Opened page to read later/too long, didn't read? "AI" narration, so stopped the video? Partly read? Read intently?
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Degenerative "AI".
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Matt Berkley[Not loaded yet]
