I see folks lauding this Cato take. But I'm hesitant to give them too much credit. They accepted racism when it made it easier for employers to exploit workers (eg, with anti-safety net & anti-labor policies). And they challenge racism now only when it removes workers that employers want to exploit.
Now, I get that some libertarians and "fiscal conservatives" might be persuaded to oppose ICE actions based on a statement like this from Cato. But I hope those who are persuaded will at least ask themselves why they're comfortable with some racist policies but not others : )
Feb 4, 2026 15:55Totally understand your concerns. I was nonpartisan budget staff for WI Legislature almost 40yrs. Never made recommendations, just alternative policies. Even recognizing the source, this study would support policies based on the benefits of immigration.
