- The only thing that happened to JK Rowling is she levelled up from a bigot to a billionaire bigot. It is quite evident in Harry Potter what her real views were even though she did everything she could to try hide them
- Can you quote some examples? Not sure what exactly you are referring to.
- She invited Epstein to a showing of cursed child 10 years after he was convicted the 1st time. She invited a sex offender to a show because he was rich. She a PoS.
- Turns out that's simply not true. Rowling did not personally invite Epstein to anything. news.meaww.com/fact-check-d...
- They'll believe any smear because it suits their propaganda, and they're angry she won't just "STFU". It's so tedious.
- To be fair, she's praised extreme misogynists many times like Matt Walsh purely because they hate trans people. Go check out how many times she called out Trump for raping women.
- yeh, this sounds like the usual fabricated rhetoric pushed by the anti Rowling haters... ... don't suppose you've got a single example of her doing this... ... thought not.
- She's literally famous for praising right wing extremists. Jesus Christ.... 🤣 Next you'll claim the sun isn't really hot
- oh stop lying. She famous for writing a series of books, that teach children it's good to be kind and look out for one another. A bunch of biology denying bigots try to accuse her of what you're saying because she doesn't accept their bigotry.
- LOL
- Indeed! Christofascist Matt Walsh is an impassioned advocate of impregnanting minors (www.indy100.com/viral/matt-w...) The supposed "champion of women's and girls' safety" sure keeps some strange bedfellows. She's nothing but an insincere, pious, sanctimonious bigoted hypocrite.
- So, if true, sounds like he's got some odd opinions ... if true. But you're playing the "she stood next to them so she must believe everything they believe" game, that the right wing media repeatly tried to muddy Corbyn with. It's was a ludicrously poor argument then. It's no better now.
- just watched the video on that link... he doesn't appear to say anything like that, although I don't actually agree with anything he did say, given it would imply sex defines the role in bringing up children. But this is not what Rowling was referring to, so you can't use this to slate her.Feb 4, 2026 16:02
