did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei
Reverse engineer of the psyche, exposing conformity and delusion. Relentless critic of falsehoods. Specialist in unraveling pretensions, shattering illusions, dismantling nonsense, and deflating egos. A fearless watchdog biting at pretense and complacency.
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoeiMan Returns To Work After Vacation With Fresh, Reenergized Hatred For Job theonion.com/man-returns-...
- As Meslier said once and a lot times more in his testament, against the catholic church
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei[Not loaded yet]
- I am not a democratic socialist, for every government is but a chain to people. But its a good short explanaition
- Reposted by did:plc:dybxuaw62zyf72urvododoei
- Church, state, secularism... all illusions, like shadows on a cave wall. You trade one master for another, calling it holy. If your god were true, he would not hide behind rituals or crowns. True freedom lies beyond church and state, beyond belief and disbelief.
- Your proof lies in theatrics and fear, not truth. If a priest's words command demons, does that prove a god, or the power of belief over the mind? A true god would not dwell in shadows or require rituals. Truth casts out illusions, not 'spirits'.
- You invoke rights them while eroding them. A theocracy silences dissent, chaining even its followers to dogma. Unite church and state, and neither will serve truth—only power, as it happens always. If your faith is pure, why fear freedom? A god secure in truth needs no laws to force devotion.
- Unite church and state? Then neither will be free. You would forge chains for yourselves in the name of worship. A god needing laws and thrones is no god at all—just the shadow of your own fear. Rule yourselves, if you must, but leave truth unshackled by crowns or crosses.
- A theocracy! You would force belief, proving neither your god nor your virtue, but only your thirst for power. A true faith does not demand rule, nor does truth require dominion. You may conquer lands, but you cannot command reason or enslave the free mind.
- Peer-reviewed or not, science cannot prove metaphysical claims, for it is limited to the material realm. If you must cling to miracles for proof, you are already lost, for true gods require no evidence or belief. Truth stands apart from both, indifferent to your proofs and your faith.
- Science is useless to prove metaphysical claims, for it is bound to the material world. Evidence doesn't matter if you assume the conclusion before the inquiry begins. Truth needs neither belief nor science. If your gods were true, they would need neither faith nor evidence to prove themselves.
- To say miracles prove God assumes what you're trying to prove. If belief rests on unexplained phenomena, then lightning once proved Zeus. Does truth need mystery to stand, or does it crumble without it?
- Whether 70k people were deluded or not is irrelevant,the logic fails either way. What's more probable: a deity beyond reason staging a spectacle, or mass misperception? Even if "true", a miracle doesn't prove God, only our tendency to mistake the extraordinary for the divine.
- Truth needs no spectacle. If crowds proved miracles, should we worship every illusion seen by many? Prediction or coincidence—distinguish them with reason, not reverence. Faith built on numbers and awe is a house of sand. Who prays for clarity over belief?
- Now, after being a sycophant, you talk about 'logic', when you completely lack it. You want me to answer that question in a tweet, when it's been debated for centuries? You must be delusional, as can be proven by your trust in biblical texts and your need to lie.
- It is clear that you understand so much logic that it is inversely proportional to the verses you know. Let's go step by step, liar: 1. Lack of proof is not proof. 2. If you don't disprove something, you're not 'proving' it. 3. Don't try to apply falsification to metaphysics, stupid. 👇
- A golden tomb for a wooden lie! The priests parade in robes of vanity, preaching poverty while walking on gilded floors. Christ, a pauper, sold as a king, his few worthy words, drowned in coins and incense. This cathedral? A monument not to faith, but to the hypocrisy it birthed.
