Corey Cusimano
Assistant Professor of Marketing at Yale University.
I study how people think about thinking, and how people think about justice.
Website: www.coreycusimano.net
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoToday's SJDM Featured Paper is: Dietvorst, B. J. (in press). Understanding people's preferences for predictions: People prioritize being right over minimizing how wrong they are in expectation. Management Science. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc...
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoA thread on our recent paper (w/Raihan Alam @raihanalam) in PNAS on why punishment often fails and what it means for crime, cooperation, democracy, and the rule of law. I’m super excited for it, it’s the lab’s most extensive experimental work to date. Check it out! 1/ www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoOfficially out in the current issue of Trends in Cognitive Sciences: "Physics versus graphics as an organizing dichotomy in cognition" www.cell.com/trends/cogni...
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano🚨From Jay Naborn & Jonathan E. Bogard: The Pick-the-Winner-Picker Heuristic: Preference for Categorically Correct Forecasts
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoMajor new paper by finds implicit measures like the IAT are no better than asking people directly about their biases. After decades of avoiding self-reports, turns out our sophisticated replacement tools work no better than what we abandoned. New post!
- What makes people feel entitled to rewards—the effort they put into their work or the outcomes they achieve? Out now in PNAS; with Jin Kim and Jared Wong: Achievement. Effort seems to matter very little (if at all). www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
- We gave online workers short jobs to do. We varied how much effort the job induced, and how good a job the workers could do on it. We then let workers choose their bonus for their work (which we then paid them). Workers paid themselves based on how good they did, not how hard they worked.
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoOur new paper with Max Taylor-Davies introduces a resource-rational model of Theory of Mind. The model can explain many of the successes and failures of mindreading in human adults and children, and non-human primates. 🧵
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoReally proud of this new work out @psychscience.bsky.social. Led by the amazing but bluesky-less Amanda Geiser and with @deborahsmall.bsky.social. We show that when comparing moral wrongs, people are (much) more willing to “scale up” than to “scale down” condemnation and punishment…
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoAre you a junior faculty member interested in spending 2-4 weeks at Princeton Psych? Please apply for our Microsabbatical program! It’s a fully funded visit for professional development and creating long-term collaborations. psych.princeton.edu/diversity/mi...
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoNew paper in Psychological Review! In "Causation, Meaning, and Communication" Ari Beller (cicl.stanford.edu/member/ari_b...) develops a computational model of how people use & understand expressions like "caused", "enabled", and "affected". 📃 osf.io/preprints/ps... 📎 github.com/cicl-stanfor... 🧵
- Reposted by Corey CusimanoThe MIT Open Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science is a growing resource, expertly edited and designed, with high quality contributors (OK OK I am one of them) oecs.mit.edu
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Reposted by Corey Cusimano[Not loaded yet]
- Good opportunity to work with some amazing scholars!
