- [This post could not be retrieved]
- Your piece argued against constitutionalism, defined as the idea "that there needs to be some higher law that is more difficult to change than the rest of the legal order." One such "higher law" would be that statutes govern exec actions. You argued against such "higher law," no?
- As to attributing "fascist" or "anarchic" arguments, my point was that, without "higher law," nothing stops fascism or anarchism (or monarchism or theocracy or whatever other form of government) from coming. This was my main point in response! balkin.blogspot.com/2022/09/bett...Dec 19, 2025 15:59
