- I think I'd rather the Court overrule Humphrey's than have the Court go around invalidating parts of statutes involving "conclusive and preclusive" presidential powers
- But maybe I don't understand that category
- I don't think the Roberts Court majority understands the limits of that category (or lack thereof) either harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04...
Dec 8, 2025 17:02
- My comment was partly informed by having read your essay. The category could be pretty broad!
- Thanks! The conception is incredibly broad bc it combines both the idea that (1) only POTUS has any authority that falls under the relevant "exclusive" power; but (2) that no other branch can INTERFERE with such a power. The noninterference principle is really what makes the conception so broad.
