That is not how I read Trump as much as i would prefer that reading. Will send you full draft when ready!
And I agree it doesn’t make sense in that the cases and doctrine are contradictory but if choose to prioritize potus over congress whenever in area of overlap that is the consequence.
Jul 14, 2025 23:02I don't see the "overlap" when the issue is how to implement *the statute.*. Congress sets the substantive terms; and the President (per Seila) controls any discretion Congress has afforded.
I'm not sure I follow your interpretation of Seila. You think it holds CONGRESS gives POTUS removal power? It says Art II gives POTUS "unrestricted" removal power, no? 1/2
Perhaps more importantly, I think you're providing a way to read the cases narrowly. I'd prefer that reading but I don't see why we should assume SCOTUS, let alone the Trump admin, will read the cases narrowly rather than broadly, and so it's important to understand the implications if read broadly
