- I’ve said it before: peer review at good journals can be good and valuable, but at the system level, “peer reviewed” [alone] does not convey any level of validity.
- Springer-Nature statement “Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.” How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
