The post I was quoting got removed, but this is the article saying "Alberta renters don’t need more ‘supply’ — they need non-market housing options”.
There’s *no* reason that advocacy for non-market housing should downplay or be put in opposition to the importance of overall supply.
Alberta renters don’t need more ‘supply’ — they need non-market housing options
Governments keep chasing the market while community housing providers quietly deliver stable, affordable homes that won’t disappear when profits rise
“Alberta renters don’t need more ‘supply’ — they need non-market housing options”
I wish people arguing for additional non-market housing could do it without downplaying total/market housing supply like this.
