Marcus Johnson
Late Gen X. Author Blu Rays for OCN Distribution and occasionally Vinegar Syndrome. No I can't tell you about the upcoming releases. They / Them
- [Not loaded yet]
- Sadly it didn't help him financially recover from this
- I'm going to assume that someone else has probably already said this but I want to put it out there that the constant appearances of "=C2" replacing Es in emails in the Epstein files and probably some of the other weird things, are, I think, probably the result of some process external to Epstein
- Good explanation here, it's just artifacts from converting between email formats essentially
- [Not loaded yet]
-
View full threadYeah, it makes a lot more sense when you know that in the original script the "it's just a joke" part was a fakeout, but apparently Paramount (wasn't it always Paramount doing this in the 80s?) decided it needed a "happy" ending
- In case anyone is curious, there was a novelization based on the original screenplay and this post details what should have been the ending to the movie
- Me (commentating at the world microwave popcorn championship): you know, Rob, I’ve always said it’s better to come out a second or two early and miss a few kernels than to wait too long and risk a burn but I’ve got a conservative play style
- Reminds me that I should watch more competitive window tint applying videos
- [Not loaded yet]
- I really wished that the 1986 April Fool's Day would have been finished / released with the original third act, where it twists from "Haha it was a joke, these people aren't really dead" to one of them actually being a psychopath and killing the survivors after the twist is revealed.
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- Great movie, and a really interesting insight to what the initial MPAA ratings were like (ie this is PG with nudity, among other things)
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- Turns out it came out last summer in regular packaging: "Shout advertises the movie, which was a film-out, as a 4K transfer from the 35 mm digital negative. Paramount has a track record of producing digital intermediates from film-outs of its catalog titles from the 1990s and 2000s."
- Since this came out in 2004 they would have made a film negative to strike the prints, right? Maybe they just did a new 4K scan of the negative and didn't mess with AI upscaling or anything
