- The misleading manifold? The current debate (decoding vs causal relevance) and a toy example I gave in the thread below got me thinking about a related issue: how decoding may reflect structure more than function. 🧵 1/5
- If we start from this circuit: Input -> neuron_1 -> output ↓ ⋮ ↓ neuron_n And record neurons 1 to n simultaneously (where n could be very large). We can obtain a matrix of neural activity (neurons x time). 🧵2/5
- A common approach to analysing this data would be to apply PCA (or another technique). Yielding a matrix of population activity (d x time). Where d < the number of neurons. A common interpretation of this would be that "the brain uses a low dimensional manifold to link this input-output". 🧵3/5
- However, In this case, from the anatomy (circuit diagram above), we know that only neuron_1 is involved in the computation (transforming the input to the output). And the manifold we observe is misleading. 🧵4/5
- Causal experiments could help to untangle this. But, it seems like this remains underexplored? Keen to hear your thoughts @mattperich.bsky.social, @juangallego.bsky.social and others! www.nature.com/articles/s41... 🧵5/5
Sep 8, 2025 13:44