The Research Problem is the "So What?" It's real-world pain. A condition causing instability, cost, or harm. If you don't solve it: • People stay sick • Systems break • Money is lost The problem is found in the world—not in academic papers.

The Research Gap is the "What's Missing?" It's a void in the literature that blocks us from solving the problem. The gap is found in papers, usually buried in Limitations or Future Research.

Here's where researchers go wrong: They start with the literature. They explain what's been studied. They list what hasn't been done. That's not a problem. That's a gap. I wrote about it here: lennartnacke.substack.com/p/why-resea...

The truth: You need both. In the right order. 1. Start with the Problem (the pain) 2. Show the Gap (why it's unsolved) 3. Present your Solution (the bridge)

Watch how this works: ❌ Wrong order: "Previous studies only used surveys. This study will use interviews." So what? Who cares? ✅ Right order:

"Readmission rates are rising, costing millions. We know medication adherence helps 70% of patients. But protocols were never tested on rural patients. Until we study them, rates stay high. This study fills that void." Pain → Missing intel → Your solution.

The Problem makes them care. The Gap proves you're the expert. The Solution shows you can fix it. 📌 Save this for your next proposal draft. Repost it to look smart to your friends. I write about grants, papers, and not losing your mind running a lab.