- [Not loaded yet]
- I think we find you're pretty sunk in the aggregate as well, depending a bit on how you're measuring replicability. We find a pretty smooth (and predicted) function of replicability dependent solely on replication sample size. In effect, if they'd run OSC 2015 at N=2000, they'd have found high rep
- In a sense they did this with ML5, which recovers significance for a few of the studies (about exactly what our model would expect, tho noisy).Feb 2, 2026 23:20
