- NEW EDITORIAL! 💡 Using data to construct tripartite networks & models 📊, we found that editorial diversification helps make peer review more inclusive & better aligned with the global distribution of ecological research 🌐 Find out more 👇 doi.org/10.1111/1365...Jan 19, 2026 13:59
- This is really interesting, but it was a shame to not see citations of the two student-led papers that first quantified geographic and gender diversity on Editorial Boards in ecology and evolution. Indeed, one of these (Espin et al 2019) explicitly called for the types of analyses done here... 1/
- … to test their hypothesized benefits to both authors and journals of geographically diverse editorial boards. 2/ journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
- (Cho et al 2014 and others hypothesized similar benefits of gender, which Fox et al addressed in a really nice series of papers for E&E journals eg besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...) 4/
- But as I said, this is a really interesting analysis and it would be great to expand it to more journals and disciplines. 5/
