- so it looks like the argument is that we should read the language of the 14th Amendment to *really mean* the language of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which raises the obvious question of "well, if they wanted the language of the latter, why didn't they use it?"
Jan 31, 2025 19:27
- It already went to the Supreme Court. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...
- Unfortunately that doesn’t mean much with our current Supreme Court. They overturned Roe v Wade and I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if they change the interpretation of the 14th amendment.
