- It's true: Academic publishing has become a racket. But I think the idea that #peerreview can happen haphazardly in the comments of a preprint server is naive. 1/ 🧪 #AcademicSky #SciPub
- Yes, we need to remove barriers to sharing research. Yes, the big publishers have taken advantage of scientists for too long. Yes, it shouldn't cost thousands of dollars to have your work peer-reviewed. 2/
- But above all, we need to ensure that the published science is trustworthy. And that comes from structured peer review. Where qualified experts come together to not only vet each other's research, but to collaborate and help make it stronger. 3/
- In a world where science is losing its credibility and powerful people continue to undermine it, I believe we need to come together and show that #peerreview actually means something. That it's how we safeguard the knowledge of our fields for generations to come. 4/
- Which is why I think it's time to reimagine what the systems of #peerreview can and should look like. It's actually why I left my faculty job to create a system of peer review that is ethical, transparent, and fair. 5/
- So if you believe in #peerreview as a fundamental part of the scientific process that increases trust, take a look at what we're building at @stacksjournal.bsky.social. I think you'll find it to be a breath of fresh air. 6/6Sep 17, 2025 16:34