[Not loaded yet]
The thread author blocks this user.
How is reacting to you lying about me and attempting to damage my side-business spam, going as far as baking my choice of TLD into your conspiracist narratives spam?
You made an active choice to attack my re-photography.store within hours of it launching with what you know are lies.
🟡 I am selling a literal product, exactly what is described. That's the literal opposite to what is defined as a grift.
🔵 Court records, do you also consider it a method of silencing the many times I have done the same with Trump's records? More on the why in the following replies.
Nov 27, 2024 10:19The thread author blocks this user.
The two "Democrats" you are talking about are Jim Stewartson and Jackie Singh.
The reason for making Stewartson's 30K credit card debts known, debts that in 2031 were and AFAIK still are looming over him are that they provided him with a financial motive for TTP an organisation he started a
The thread author blocks this user.
organisation he started a 25K fundraiser for at a time when he was struggling to meet rent and voiced that in chats with others in the group.
There was not even a plan for what legal form the org should have until I asked. Raising legitimate questions/concerns of the true purpose of the fundraiser.
The thread author blocks this user.
There's a *lot* more to the above all which I can provide receipts for, many being Jim's own words, but I'll leave that out for brevity.
On to Jackie Singh and her personal bankruptcy.
My reason for making people aware of that is to demonstrate that she's a risk and knowingly puts others at risk.
The thread author blocks this user.
In 2016 when she sought and gained employment in a senior IT sec position in the Biden campaign she did so knowing that due to her +200 credit card debt going back as far as 2008 she was a liability, and more likely than not didn't disclose it as she got the position.
x.com/Ankh_Morpork...The thread author blocks this user.
The $270K debts in question is a disqualifier for IT sec related positions and yet Singh sought employment with the Walz/Harris campaign and judging by her posts she also seeks employment with access to classified materials.
The thread author blocks this user.
Either Singh doesn't know that such debts are an immediate disqualifier for such positions or she does know and seeks them anyway without disclosure.
In the best case she is demonstrating gross incompetence, in the worst, disregard for the security of the orgs where she seeks to be employed.
The thread author blocks this user.
🟡 Tapping into xenophobia and tribalism is what fascists do and Steph has always been critical of QAnon.
🔵 There are much better ways to legally obtain addresses and phone numbers, which is the only data I see as merchant.
🟢 For what, how is having a business and market it a breach of ToS?
The thread author blocks this user.
🔵 I have never sold or attempted to sell a calendar, though I might if time allows to make on before the end of year and publish it on
www.re-photography.store
🟡 You know that I only ever had one fundraiser and one Kofi, in late summer/autumn of 2022.
🟡 This is "nothing"?
x.com/Ankh_Morpork...The thread author blocks this user.
The KoFi was a source of pocket change at a period of half a year where I had to choose between working or giving up on my sick dog.
I chose a chance at life for Lulu and she's now living it and bringing a bit of happiness to the world.
re-photography.store/products/chi....
That's a grift to you?
The thread author blocks this user.
The GoFundMe financed her surgery, that I didn't have funds for after having not worked for over six months as her medication schedule didn't allow for it, with me administering her eye drops every four hours from 10 AM to 10 PM.
How is that a grift?
The thread author blocks this user.
And the KoFi didn't "sell" anything that wasn't promised or "delivered" which is a definitional criteria for a grift.
The evidence, well I am delivering right here, right now, over two years after my last mention of it other than in response to you and other crying BlueAnons.
x.com/search?q=Ko-...The thread author blocks this user.
You offer zero evidence in that thread of "0auth [sic] having been exploited by anyone, that inclusion is pure FUD, using tech lingo you don't understand to inferr that I have exploited vulnerabilities in the Shopify platform where auth0 is not necessary, if even used at all, for a purchase.
The thread author blocks this user.
And why would I need to use an exploit to login to my own accounts on Shopify and Printify?
If you have evidence of any grifting or unlawful activity by me, bring the receipts, Until then, please stop lying and making things up.