did:plc:huzcafk4a4ne5g434oxgxzo2
- “It is clear that taking no action at the moment is not a lawful option for the Scottish government.” We will go to court again if ministers do not act. Read more in @thetimes ⤵️ www.thetimes.com/uk/scotland/...
- Providing single sex services with confidence: a template for clear guidance sex-matters.org/posts/update...
- The single-sex and separate-sex service exceptions in the Equality Act should be straightforward and easy to use. The recent judgment by the Supreme Court in the case of For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers made clear that the Equality Act is based on biological sex.
- Reposted by did:plc:huzcafk4a4ne5g434oxgxzo2TAKE ACTION: Email your MP! Calling all sex-realist women and men! Bank holiday weekend action. Use this tool to write to your MP and tell them how much you appreciate the Supreme Court's clarity and want them to support local organisations to start following it. sex-matters.org/take-action/...
- Guess again 🙄 Lot of imagination going on here 🤣
- Following the #SupremeCourt ruling, everyone wants to talk about toilets. The Equality Act, and this judgment, are about much more than toilets. But toilets are important. Sex Matters' latest blog answers the most common questions. 👇 sex-matters.org/posts/update...
- “Those provisions were always there, but the Supreme Court has set that out beyond a doubt.” Clear, strong and impressive from Labour's Minister for Women & Equalities Bridget Phillipson MP speaking for the Government on the #SupremeCourt judgment. Great to hear! 🙏
- Right now a lot of people need to change their mind about the protected characteristic of sex. The legal accepted wisdom was wrong. Naomi Cunningham wrote about changing her mind on this in 2022 after some late night debates... sex-matters.org/posts/update...
- 16th April 2025, the day women in the UK got their rights back.
- We had precooked two statements: one for a win and one for a loss. We didn’t dare hope the result would be better than 8 on our scale – roughly, an FWS win, but with comments designed to deflect criticism from those opposed to sex-based rights.
