- Misleading write-up - it's true that there is a crisis in A&E, but this is not because of "soaring demand". The RCN report itself shows that A&E attendances are only 3% higher than in 2019, while 12+ hour waits are 8,033% higher. www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
- The poor outcomes in A&E are obvious to anyone who looks at the numbers or has simply been to an ED in the last few years. But as @policyskeptic.bsky.social has repeatedly argued, incorrect diagnoses of the *drivers* of poor outcomes are obstacles to solutions which will improve performance.
- The data *in the report cited* is enough to disprove the hypothesis that poor performance is driven by increased demand. (See +3% attendances vs +8,033% in 12 hr waits) The real cause of long waits in A&E is poor patient flow, driven by operational dysfunction in other parts of hospitals.
- The full RCN report is mixed. It's reasonable to highlight high bed occupancy rates as a driver of A&E problems. If there's nowhere to admit patients to, they're either stuck waiting for hours, receive (unsafe) corridor care, or are forced to leave before receiving treatment.
- But it draws the wrong conclusions on workforce: worsening A&E performance has happened despite 30%+ increases in the number of nurses working in hospitals since 2019. RCN implies these increases are insufficient due to "increased demand". But, as we've seen, this is just incorrect!
- Media reporting (and parts of the RCN report) seem to conflate "increased demand for urgent care" with "increased pressures on hospitals". In doing so - they're obscuring the drivers of the problem and leading readers towards ineffective solutions (i.e. more staff, more funding).Dec 3, 2025 12:50