- [Not loaded yet]
- Constitution tells us conduct that can give rise to disqualification under 14th Amendment is anti-democratic. U.S. is nation of laws, not of men - it is Constitution that is providing avenue for disqualification of tRump. This isn't politics. This is opposite of politics. This is constitutional law.
- "I am confident Supreme Court would affirm Colorado Supreme Court’s (CSC) decision based upon Section 3 of 14th amendment. I know Colorado Supreme Court decision is unassailable in every single respect under Constitution. I believe this Supreme Court will affirm CSC if it takes case for review".
- "Colorado Supreme Court (CSC) decision was 120+ pages. CSC addressed every single federal constitutional question as to meaning & interpretation of 14th Amendment. It resolved every 1 of those questions as required under federal constitutional law".
- “Opinion is unassailable in every respect. As it's masterful judicial opinion, I believe Supreme Court should — & I believe will — affirm CSC if given opportunity".
- In mid Nov, Kamala Strongly "DidN't want to know about any election voting data irregularities" Stephen Spoonamore, highest profile election data expert, is Experienced CEO or CTO - Not "dude in hoodie at keyboard". "tRump won PA. Harris won NC, WI, MI & AZ." spoutible.com/thread/38163...
- Spoonamore is lifelong Republican In NC, Harris underperformed every Democrat on ticket - surely(?) she would have had higher profile than most of them Yet, tRump got 32% more votes than entire R House - explain than Huge comparative difference!Jan 20, 2025 18:07
- Duty to Warn Letter to VP Harris Re: Election 2024 Attack results are improbable in extreme & well tailored to sole benefit of your opponent Historically absurd number of tRump-only bullet ballots substack.com/inbox/post/1...