Bilal Baydoun

Views here my own. Director of Democratic Institutions @rooseveltinstitute.org and @Rooseveltforward.org. #FirstGen Go Blue.
Joined September 2023
  • In whatever democracy reform package/effort emerges out of this, we cannot give short shrift to public media as vital democratic infrastructure. It has to be front and center.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • Democracy Dies in Darkness. That’s why we love this new UV Lamp! (sponsored)
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • Any newspapers that pose a threat to their billionaire owners are going to get the Grover Norquist treatment. They will be made small enough to drown in a bathtub. And the owners will use same pretexts—efficiency, viability, “waste”—to justify this ideological project.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • What we’re witnessing at the Washington Post is the folly of entrusting self-interested billionaires with any democratic institution, especially a free and independent press. We need to a) permanently bury the myth of billionaire saviors and b) build a world-class public media system.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • Yes.
    • always bears repeating that this is NOT a financial decision. jeff bezos is worth over 250 billion dollars. he can afford to lose many millions and never even notice it. this is, at its core, a political and personal decision by bezos to destroy the post
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • To be clear this is a joke and not a direct quote from the Bezos Zoom call.
    • If you cut all the journalists you can just run sponsored content at every desk. Sports Desk by DraftKings. International Desk by Northrop Grumman. Or maybe the reporters can wear ad jackets like NASCAR drivers. That would be great for viability.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • Journalism is valuable because of its benefits to the polity, not how much it contributes to GDP. Talking about newsrooms only in economic or financial terms is a slick way to obscure that. Viability to what end? Presumably, one would want a newspaper to remain viable so that it can be a newspaper.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • If you cut all the journalists you can just run sponsored content at every desk. Sports Desk by DraftKings. International Desk by Northrop Grumman. Or maybe the reporters can wear ad jackets like NASCAR drivers. That would be great for viability.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • Yes but this wasn't inevitable. The internet destroyed key sources of revenue like classified ads (e.g. Craigslist). But we could insulated journalism from market failure by standing up a robust publicly-funded media system. We still can! Commercialism was always an existential threat to journalism.
    • I'm a contrarian on this WaPo thing. I hate to see it destroyed but then again I hated to see all the newspapers destroyed. I don't think this has too much to do with Trump or Bezos directly; it is the rise of the Internet that slowly but surely destroyed the newspaper age.
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
  • This. The economic justifications we get whenever a newspaper is decimated are always ideological. "Viability" is a euphemism that treats journalistic organizations like profit-maximizing firms and nothing else. Democracy isn't viable without journalism.
    • Bezos isn't destroying the Washington Post because it isn't profitable. He's destroying the Washington Post because he's calculated that a robust free press threatens the ability of his class to warp society around their interests
    View on BlueskyShow all post labels
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙